- We are talking now in this House about zero tolerance.
- Sålunda talar vi i denna kammare numera om nolltolerans.
- In this case, we are not talking about technical problems, which may occur, even in the most stable democracies.
- I det här fallet talar vi inte om tekniska problem som kan uppkomma även i de mest konsoliderade demokratier.
- We are talking in general terms - and this is more serious - about contradictions between our economic and trade policies and our defence policies.
- Vi talar i mera allmänna ordalag, vilket är betydligt allvarligare, om motsättningar mellan vår ekonomiska och kommersiella politik och vår försvarspolitik.
- In this case we are talking about the Parliament of Latvia, which is discussing the implementation of Article 13 - on European anti-discrimination legislation - as well as a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriages.
- Vi talar i det här fallet om Lettlands parlament, där man diskuterar genomförandet av artikel 13 - om EU:s lagstiftning mot diskriminering - samt ett förslag till konstitutionellt förbud mot äktenskap mellan personer av samma kön.
- I should like to remind you that, in these efforts that have been announced, we are talking about a 9% share of nuclear energy, 54% energy efficiency, 35% renewables and 14% geological carbon capture and storage.
- Jag vill påminna om att vi, i samband med de åtgärder som tillkännagivits, talar om en andel på 9 procent för kärnkraften, 54 procent för ökad energieffektivitet, 35 procent för förnybara energikällor och 14 procent för geologisk avskiljning och lagring av koldioxid.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'prep' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t11.lemma_id = 51855 AND
t12.lemma_id = 8748 AND
t21.lemma_id = 49482 AND
t22.lemma_id = 26495),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;