- It is therefore unacceptable that the Commission’s proposal should seek to put Danish consumers in a worse position in relation to commerce using digital networks than is the case for commerce in the physical world.
- Det är därför oacceptabelt att kommissionens förslag kommer att ställa de danska konsumenterna i ett sämre läge vid handel via digitala nät än vid handel i den fysiska världen.
- Today we have actually succeeded in averting the risk of farmers being put in a position where, because of the difficult economic climate, they have to hold on to old, much more polluting tractors for longer than necessary.
- I dag har vi lyckats undvika risken för att lantbrukare ställs i ett läge där de, på grund av de besvärliga ekonomiska förutsättningarna, tvingas behålla gamla och mycket mer förorenande traktorer längre än nödvändigt.
- This is why I find it regrettable that there are still doubts about our readiness to apply the acquis and that some Member States continue to protect their so-called ’national security’ by putting unjustified obstacles in the way of a Member State which has earned its right to be treated in a fair and non-discriminatory manner.
- Därför beklagar jag att det fortfarande förekommer tvivel om vår beredskap att tillämpa regelverket och att vissa medlemsstater fortsätter att skydda sin så kallade ”nationella säkerhet” genom att ställa omotiverade hinder i vägen för en medlemsstat som har förtjänat sin rätt att behandlas rättvist och utan diskriminering.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'prep' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t11.lemma_id = 3244 AND
t12.lemma_id = 8748 AND
t21.lemma_id = 62944 AND
t22.lemma_id = 26495),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;