- In my opinion such a requirement is too far-reaching.
- Ett sådant krav är enligt min mening för långtgående.
- Amendment No 48, which I tabled, is in the more appropriate place, in my view.
- Ändringsförslag 48, som jag har ingivit, är enligt min mening mer ändamålsenligt.
- Amendment No 48, which I tabled, is in the more appropriate place, in my view.
- Ändringsförslag 48, som jag har ingivit, är enligt min mening mer ändamålsenligt.
- In my opinion, a further crucial issue is that of increasing the European Parliament’s control and influence over the European Development Fund.
- En annan avgörande fråga är enligt min mening att öka Europaparlamentets kontroll och inflytande över Europeiska utvecklingsfonden.
- In my opinion there is no point in making extensive changes in the last year of MAGP IV’s validity, especially when they could have negative repercussions for safety on board fishing vessels.
- Enligt min uppfattning är det ingen idé att besluta om djupgående förändringar under det sista året som FUP IV gäller, framför allt om dessa skulle kunna få en negativ inverkan på säkerheten ombord på fartygen.
- In my opinion there is no need to convince any of the States represented here that in the face of an economic and financial crisis, Structural Funds are a key tool for stimulating the economy at a regional level.
- Enligt min uppfattning är det ingen idé att övertyga någon av de stater som företräds här att strukturfonder är ett nyckelinstrument för att stimulera ekonomin på regional nivå inför en ekonomisk och finansiell kris.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'prep' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t11.lemma_id = 24585 AND
t12.lemma_id = 8748 AND
t21.lemma_id = 33361 AND
t22.lemma_id = 42221),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;