- The focus must therefore be on diversity.
- Inriktningen måste därför ligga på mångfald.
- The focus was on energy and climate policy.
- Fokus låg på energi- och klimatpolitik.
- My final comment is on a somewhat more personal note.
- Min sista kommentar ligger på ett något mer personligt plan.
- On category 3, as I said, our priority has been on the employment chapter.
- Vad gäller rubrik 3 så har vår prioritering, som jag sade, legat på sysselsättningskapitlet.
- Ecologically speaking, the primary focus should obviously be on energy efficiency and the latest environmental technology.
- Om man talar i ekologiska termer bör den främsta tonvikten uppenbarligen ligga på energieffektivitet och den senaste miljötekniken.
- Whereas the emphasis in the original plans was on attendance, it is now actually on demonstrating personal skills during the examination.
- Om vikten i de ursprungliga planerna låg på närvaro så ligger den nu på att verkligen visa personlig kapacitet vid examensprovet.
- I hope that in the case of other measures, such as combating money laundering and so many others which are on the table in the Council, we will not wait until we have to act in haste, until there are other dramatic events, in order to implement them.
- Jag hoppas att vi även kommer att agera snabbt när det gäller de övriga åtgärderna, som bekämpningen av penningtvätt och så många andra åtgärder som ligger på rådets bord, och att vi inte väntar på någon dramatisk händelse för att inleda dem. Jag anser att alla dessa åtgärder är absolut nödvändiga för att försvara vår värld och framför allt friheten.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'prep' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t11.lemma_id = 24585 AND
t12.lemma_id = 11075 AND
t21.lemma_id = 14977 AND
t22.lemma_id = 40192),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;