- Mr De Gucht, perhaps you could explain the safeguard clauses to me in simple terms.
- Ni kanske kan förklara skyddsklausulerna för mig i enkla ordalag.
- In my guidelines, I also explained why the crisis calls for a much stronger focus on the social dimension in Europe at all levels of decision making - in Europe, but also at a national level.
- I mina riktlinjer förklarade jag också varför krisen kräver en starkare fokusering på den sociala dimensionen i Europa på alla beslutsnivåer - i EU, men också på nationell nivå.
- Mr President, since I already explained in yesterday’s debate why this motion for a resolution strikes me as silly and undemocratic, I need not labour this point any further, and I already concur in advance with all the bad things Mr Claeys is about to say on this subject.
- Eftersom jag redan i gårdagens debatt förklarade varför jag tycker att det här resolutionsförslaget är löjligt och odemokratiskt behöver jag inte utveckla detta mer, och jag instämmer i förväg i allt negativt som Philip Claeys kommer att säga i ämnet.
- Maybe I should explain in this Parliament that the Community institutions all agree that every policy should be directed towards achieving full employment.
- Kanske skulle det behöva förklaras, i detta parlament, att alla gemenskapsinstitutioner är överens om att inrikta alla politikområden mot full sysselsättning, men att fastställa en rättsprincip om full sysselsättning i Europeiska unionen skulle vara fullkomligt nonsens, även om vi alla skulle vilja uppnå detta mål. Att blanda ihop en politisk inriktning av etisk karaktär med en rättsprincip är ett rättsligt misstag som inte något betänkande i detta parlament borde begå.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'prep' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADP' AND
t11.lemma_id = 16994 AND
t12.lemma_id = 8748 AND
t21.lemma_id = 54875 AND
t22.lemma_id = 26495),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;