- It has to be said that it really is important to amend the existing legislation and bring it up to date.
- Jag måste säga att det verkligen är viktigt att ändra den befintliga lagstiftningen och uppdatera den.
- Accordingly, there is nothing in Community law that would prevent the Swedish Government from amending its legislation in the manner proposed.
- Därför finns det heller inga bestämmelser i gemenskapslagstiftningen som hindrar den svenska regeringen från att ändra sin lagstiftning såsom föreslagits.
- Is it also true that the applicant countries do not have to amend their legislation on these matters but rather continue to be sovereign because this is not an area of EU competence in relation to the applicant countries as well?
- Stämmer det också att ansökarländerna inte måste ändra sin lagstiftning i dessa frågor, utan snarare fortsätter att vara suveräna, eftersom detta heller inte är ett område som faller under EU:s behörighet när det gäller ansökarländerna?
- The Commission shares this view and intends to solve the problem by amending the legislation and also by asking railway authorities in the Member States to modify their attitude, and hence the importance of the communication issued along with the legislative proposals, suggesting solutions that may be applied immediately with no need to wait for any amendments to laws.
- Kommissionen delar denna åsikt och avser att lösa problemet genom att ändra lagstiftningen och också genom att uppmana järnvägsmyndigheterna i medlemsstaterna att ändra sitt förhållningssätt, och därav vikten av det meddelande som lagts fram tillsammans med lagstiftningsförslagen, vilket innehåller lösningar som kan tillämpas omedelbart utan att lagändringar måste inväntas.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'dobj' AND
s2.val = 'OO' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t22.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t11.lemma_id = 61148 AND
t12.lemma_id = 6485 AND
t21.lemma_id = 28236 AND
t22.lemma_id = 25910),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;