- In other words, we need to ask if we should give greater freedom to operators - as certain people wish, especially for the new markets - or instead maintain the regulated services.
- Vi måste med andra ord fundera över om vi ska ge aktörerna större frihet - som en del personer vill, särskilt för de nya marknaderna - eller i stället behålla de reglerade tjänsterna.
- In my opinion, there should be a compromise amendment giving Member States the freedom to choose the type of qualification required of the responsible person, in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
- Jag anser att vi i ett kompromissändringsförslag bör ge de enskilda medlemsstaterna friheten, enligt subsidiaritetsprincipen, att besluta om vilken typ av kvalifikationer som den ansvarige personen bör ha.
- it must give the national public authorities the freedom to choose the structure (creation of mixed economy companies or other legal forms, a public structure taking control of a private business, outsourcing, etc.);
- I synnerhet får det bara gälla partnerskap mellan den offentliga och den privata sektorn, det måste bygga på skillnaden mellan partnerskap/kontrakt å ena sidan och partnerskap/koncessioner å den andra med respekt för de olika formernas särdrag så att nya specifika bestämmelser för OPP undviks, det får inte innebära att de regler som förhandlats fram för förfarandet vid koncessioner ifrågasätts, det måste ge de nationella offentliga myndigheterna frihet att välja struktur (bolag med blandad ekonomi eller andra rättsliga former, en offentlig struktur för kontroll av privata företag, outsourcing etc.) och slutligen måste det garantera att varje gemenskapsinitiativ överensstämmer med behoven av offentliga tjänster och nationella önskemål i detta hänseende.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'dobj' AND
s2.val = 'OO' AND
t11.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t21.ctag = 'VERB' AND
t12.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t22.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t11.lemma_id = 59859 AND
t12.lemma_id = 35793 AND
t21.lemma_id = 54254 AND
t22.lemma_id = 46589),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;