- Better quality and more accurate first decisions would save money through fewer costly appeals.
- Bättre kvalitet och mer korrekta första beslut skulle spara pengar genom färre dyra överklaganden.
- The main objective is to increase competition, which will result in greater choice, lower prices and better quality for end customers.
- Huvudsyftet är att uppnå ökad konkurrens som leder till ökat utbud, lägre priser och bättre kvalitet för slutkunderna.
- Parliament is proposing, for example, that the Community should adopt a new way of thinking, involving the use of tax instruments to achieve better air quality at a reasonable price.
- Parlamentet föreslår bland annat, att man i gemenskapen skulle tillägna sig ett nytt tänkesätt, som skulle innebära att man även kunde använda sig av skatteinstrumentet för att få till stånd en bättre kvalitet till rimligt pris.
- It is a problem calling for many different solutions, including better organised and more efficient health care, so that a better quality of service can be obtained for the same money.
- Det är ett problem som påkallar många olika lösningar, bland annat bättre organisation och en effektivisering av hälsovården, så att bättre kvalitet ombesörjs för samma pengar, och nya medicinska metoder kan också leda till bättre och billigare behandlingar.
- The rapporteur restates Parliament’s strong support for Commissioner Monti in spelling out that effective competition is not only an important engine of economic growth but also works to the advantage of consumers, through greater variety, better quality and lower prices for both goods and services.
- Föredraganden upprepar parlamentets starka stöd för kommissionär Monti i det att han förklarar att en effektiv konkurrens inte bara är en viktig motor för ekonomisk tillväxt, utan även verkar till konsumenternas fördel, eftersom den leder till större urval, bättre kvalitet och lägre priser på både varor och tjänster.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 9375 AND
t12.lemma_id = 12586 AND
t21.lemma_id = 12127 AND
t22.lemma_id = 2973),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;