- To us it is not clear what is meant by ’due account’.
- Vi tycker inte att det med tydlighet framgår vad ”vederbörlig hänsyn” betyder.
- And who decides whether a Member State has taken ’due account’ of the other Member State?
- Och vem bedömer om den ena medlemsstaten tar ”vederbörlig hänsyn” till den andra?
- Article 6(1) says that each Member State must take due account of registrations and authorisations previously granted by another Member State.
- I artikel 6.1 står det att varje medlemsstat skall ta vederbörlig hänsyn till registreringar och godkännanden som tidigare utfärdats i en annan medlemsstat.
- In my opinion, we need objective criteria that take due account of the peculiarities of the agricultural sector in the individual EU Member States.
- Jag anser att vi behöver objektiva kriterier som tar vederbörlig hänsyn till särdragen hos de enskilda medlemsstaternas jordbrukssektor.
- Despite the fact that Mrs Miguélez Ramos’s report is an own-initiative report, it is to be hoped that due account will be taken of it in the Commission’s presentation, which we hope it will give in the next few weeks, on its communication on the international dimension of the CFP in the context of the reform of this policy.
- Trots det faktum att Miguélez Ramos betänkande är ett initiativbetänkande bör man inte förvänta sig att kommissionen kommer att ta vederbörlig hänsyn till detta i sin presentation av meddelandet om den gemensamma fiskeripolitikens internationella dimension inom ramen för reformen av denna politik, som vi hoppas att man kommer att lägga fram under de följande veckorna.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 8388 AND
t12.lemma_id = 8859 AND
t21.lemma_id = 585 AND
t22.lemma_id = 27643),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;