- The internal borders have disappeared, and accordingly the citizens expect a comparable degree of internal security in their national states, of protection against organised crime and also of protection against illegal immigration.
- De inre gränserna har försvunnit och då väntar sig medborgarna också ett mått av inre säkerhet, skydd mot organiserad brottslighet och illegal invandring, som kan jämföras med förhållandena i nationalstaterna.
- The extraordinary summit meeting scheduled to take place in Tampere during the Finnish Presidency will be devoted to the internal security of the Union, including action to combat drug trafficking, which is rife in the single market.
- Det extra toppmötet i Tammerfors under Finlands ordförandeskap kommer att ägnas åt gemenskapens inre säkerhet, bland annat åt åtgärderna mot den narkotikahandel som frodas inom den inre marknaden.
- The bad news is that the way in which these decisions and stipulations were made has drawn heavy criticism and even protests from the overwhelming majority of our committee, and I hope that the House will share our indignation, because this is a very important matter in terms of parliamentary control and codetermination in the field of internal security.
- jag hoppas att denna församling delar dessa protester, eftersom de är av stor betydelse för frågan om parlamentarisk kontroll och parlamentets medbestämmande på den inre säkerhetens område.
- to enhance Europe’s capacity to act in areas like migration, energy, climate change, internal security;
- Lissabonfördraget förblir av grundläggande vikt för att vi ska kunna bemöta de utmaningar som Europa ställs inför i dag, att ha en mer demokratisk union, utöka Europaparlamentets befogenheter och erkänna de nationella parlamentens roll i EU-politiken, att stärka EU:s kapacitet att agera på områden som migration, energi, klimatförändringar och inre säkerhet, och slutligen att se till att EU agerar mer samordnat och effektivt på internationell nivå.
- It lays the foundations on which the freedom of the individual can be enshrined in EU law, it is the means by which the Union can become an area in which freedom, justice and security are guaranteed, and it is certainly the most significant increase of powers in the field of internal security.
- Det är förutsättningen för att den personliga friheten skall förverkligas och för att ett område av frihet, rätt och säkerhet skall föreverkligas, och det innebär den nog mest betydelsefulla befogenhetstillväxten på den inre säkerhetens område.
- Unfortunately, however, when you have two such high-profile, big systems - the Schengen Information System (SIS) II and the visa information system (VIS) - being affected, this also affects the credibility not only of the Union’s internal security - and I will come back to that later - but also of the EU’s visa policy.
- Men när man har två sådana högprofilerade stora system - Schengens informationssystem (SIS) II och informationssystemet för viseringar (VIS) som påverkas, påverkar detta tyvärr också trovärdigheten inte bara för unionens inre säkerhet - vilket jag kommer tillbaka till senare - utan också för EU:s viseringspolitik.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 557 AND
t12.lemma_id = 58380 AND
t21.lemma_id = 32567 AND
t22.lemma_id = 5943),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;