- Why not consider direct aid?
- Varför inte direkta stöd?
- The Commissioner has said today that the conditions for renewing direct aid have almost been met.
- Kommissionsledamoten sa i dag att villkoren för en förnyelse av ett direkt stöd nästan har uppfyllts.
- The direct aid that could be put in is miniscule compared to what the need actually is.
- Det direkta stöd som skulle kunna sättas in är mycket litet jämfört med vad som egentligen behövs.
- The second approach involves reducing direct aid to agricultural income to 85% of its current level.
- För det andra skulle en minskning av det direkta stödet till jordbruksinkomsterna till 85 procent av den nuvarande nivån göra det möjligt att sänka kostnaden för utvidgningen till 0,10 procent av gemenskapsbudgeten.
- Instead of spending large sums of money on direct aid, it may be better to invigorate poor countries through economic cooperation, including trade and the exchange of goods, services and skills, so that they can build their own prosperity.
- I stället för att satsa stora belopp på direkt stöd kan det vara bättre att stärka fattiga länder genom ekonomiskt samarbete, däribland handel och utbyte av varor, tjänster och kompetens, så att de kan bygga upp sin egen välfärd.
- The Commission report on the operation of the EU’s own resources system includes a proposal that the Member States should continue to pay direct aid under the common agricultural policy based on Community legislation as they do at present, but that instead of receiving a 100 % refund from the EU budget, they will receive only a partial refund of 75 %.
- I kommissionens rapport om hur systemet för EU:s egna medel skall fungera ingår ett förslag enligt vilket medlemsstaterna på samma sätt som i dag skall fortsätta att betala det direkta stödet inom ramen för den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken på grundval av gemenskapslagstiftningen, men i stället för att få en återbäring om 100 procent från EU:s budget skall de endast få återbäring till viss del (75 procent).
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 44708 AND
t12.lemma_id = 25271 AND
t21.lemma_id = 37376 AND
t22.lemma_id = 20888),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;