- Everything that has been said here about the relation to trade policy, access to our markets and the need to diversify agricultural production and the economy in these countries is true, but it is also true that there is a sort of de-linkage from all this affecting the very poor subsistence farmers.
- Jag har just kommit tillbaka från en vecka i Zambia och Angola, och i Zambia, i synnerhet, kunde vi närmare undersöka verkligheten på ort och ställe genom att besöka distributionscentrum för livsmedel och stödtjänster för självförsörjande bönder osv. Allt som har sagts här angående relationen mellan handelspolitik, tillträde till våra marknader och behovet av att variera jordbruksproduktionen och ekonomin i dessa länder är sant, men det är också sant att det förekommer ett slags bruten länk i allt detta som berör de mycket fattiga självförsörjande bönderna.
- Whoever has seen fair trade producers at work, and in the past few years I have seen a number of projects in developing countries, knows that the commercial profit is perhaps somewhat lower but that at the same time the producers, many of them poor farmers, are often much better off if there really is a question of higher incomes for the workers involved, many more subsidiary social activities, such as schools and clinics that are set up, and that the population in the region also makes more profit.
- Den som har sett producenter inom den rättvisa och solidariska handeln arbeta i praktiken, och jag har de senaste åren sett flera projekt i utvecklingsländer, vet att vinsten på handeln kanske är lite mindre, men vet samtidigt att producenterna, fattiga bönder, ofta har det mycket bättre, att det rör sig om högre inkomster för berörda arbetstagare, mycket mer sociala biverksamheter, som till exempel skolor och polikliniker som inrättas och att även befolkningen i området kan dra större nytta av det.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 38157 AND
t12.lemma_id = 15885 AND
t21.lemma_id = 53161 AND
t22.lemma_id = 26887),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;