- There is now apparently, within the European Union, a classic case of ethnic discrimination, and that is happening in Italy, where people are being criminalised because of their ethnic background.
- Jag vill bryta ner denna fråga lite till. Det verkar nu, inom Europeiska unionen, finnas ett klassiskt fall av etnisk diskriminering, och det händer i Italien, där människor kriminaliseras på grund av sin etniska bakgrund.
- Admittedly there was a degree of cynical hypocrisy shown by some states in hiding behind the demonisation of Israel and America, including some African countries with appalling records of ethnic discrimination or human rights violations, and Arab countries unwilling to come clean about their own role in the slave trade.
- Det fanns onekligen en grad av cyniskt hyckleri som uppvisades av vissa stater som gömde sig bakom svartmålningen av Israel och Amerika, däribland vissa afrikanska länder med ett förfärligt förflutet med etnisk diskriminering eller överträdelser av de mänskliga rättigheterna, och arabländer som inte ville tala öppet om sin egen roll i slavhandeln.
- In Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, despite the peace agreement signed in the latter country last year, there has been little or no improvement in the human rights situation, and even in Kyrgyzstan, where human rights are respected in many areas, there are still problems with citizens’ limited ability to change the government, freedom of speech and the press, due process for the accused, religious freedom and ethnic discrimination.
- I Turkmenistan och Tadjikistan har man, trots det fredsavtal som förra året skrevs under i det sistnämnda landet, gjort små eller inga framsteg vad beträffar situationen med mänskliga rättigheter, och t.o.m. i Kirgizistan, där de mänskliga rättigheterna respekteras på många områden, finns det fortfarande problem med medborgarnas begränsade möjligheter till att byta regering, yttrandefrihet och pressfrihet, en skälig rättegång för de anklagade, religionsfrihet och etnisk diskriminering.
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 3597 AND
t12.lemma_id = 26412 AND
t21.lemma_id = 24614 AND
t22.lemma_id = 27261),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;