- What we need is a common European asylum and immigration policy based on European humanitarian values.
- Naturligtvis behöver vi en gemensam europeisk asyl- och invandringspolitik, men den måste grunda sig på europeiska humanitära värderingar.
- I would like to ask the 34 delegations of the European Parliament to enhance their promotion of European values on other continents in the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue, and to facilitate the knowledge of other cultures and traditions.
- Jag skulle vilja be de 34 delegationerna i Europaparlamentet att öka spridningen av de europeiska värderingarna till andra världsdelar under det europeiska året för interkulturell dialog, och främja kunskapen om andra kulturer och traditioner.
- What I expect from you - what I hope for from you, because I would like, in the future, to respect you as President of the Commission - is not your memoirs, in however many years’ time, but that you will acknowledge your responsibilities in this serious act, which casts a shadow over European values.
- Vad jag förväntar mig från er - vad jag hoppas på från er, eftersom jag i framtiden skulle vilja respektera er som kommissionsordförande - är inte era memoarer, hur många år det än tar innan de blir färdiga, utan att ni erkänner ert ansvar i detta allvarliga mål, som kastar en skugga över de europeiska värderingarna.
- I welcome the tone of the recent Berlin Declaration regarding European values, as well as the programme of the President of the European Parliament, who stated that the question of human dignity is at the core of his and of our approach when voting on European legislation.
- Jag välkomnar tonfallet i Berlinförklaringen när det gäller europeiska värderingar, och även den programförklaring som har formulerats av Europaparlamentets talman, där han slår fast att den mänskliga värdigheten ska vara vägledande både för honom och för oss när vi röstar om EU-lagstiftningsförslag.
- But with that perspective, if the accession negotiations deliver all these results, it is very important that the European Union is open for the membership of Turkey because this would strengthen European values, Europe and the European Union, and I think that is the necessary and obvious conclusion of this debate.
- Men med detta perspektiv, om anslutningsförhandlingarna leder till alla dessa resultat, är det mycket viktigt att EU är öppet för Turkiets medlemskap eftersom detta skulle stärka de europeiska värderingarna, Europa och Europeiska unionen, och jag anser att det är den nödvändiga och självklara slutsatsen av denna debatt.
- is the European Union and are Europe and European values better off with a Turkey that is fulfilling all the requirements and has made all the reforms that are underlined in the report, or are we better off with a Turkey that will maybe lean in the future more to other parts of the world, to other values?
- Vinner Europeiska unionen, Europa och de europeiska värderingarna på ett Turkiet som uppfyller alla krav och har genomfört alla reformer som betonas i betänkandet, eller vinner vi mer på ett Turkiet som i framtiden kanske kommer att stödja sig på andra delar av världen, andra värderingar?
show query
SET search_path TO f9miniensv;
WITH
list AS (SELECT
t11.token_id AS t11,
t12.token_id AS t12,
t21.token_id AS t21,
t22.token_id AS t22,
r1.dep_id AS dep1,
r2.dep_id AS dep2
FROM
deprel r1
JOIN depstr s1 ON s1.dep_id = r1.dep_id
JOIN word_align a1 ON a1.wsource = r1.head AND a1.wsource < a1.wtarget
JOIN word_align a2 ON a2.wsource = r1.dependent
JOIN deprel r2 ON r2.head = a1.wtarget AND r2.dependent = a2.wtarget
JOIN depstr s2 ON s2.dep_id = r2.dep_id
JOIN token t11 ON t11.token_id = r1.head
JOIN token t21 ON t21.token_id = r2.head
JOIN token t12 ON t12.token_id = r1.dependent
JOIN token t22 ON t22.token_id = r2.dependent
WHERE
s1.val = 'amod' AND
s2.val = 'AT' AND
t11.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t21.ctag = 'NOUN' AND
t12.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t22.ctag = 'ADJ' AND
t11.lemma_id = 26398 AND
t12.lemma_id = 21311 AND
t21.lemma_id = 38131 AND
t22.lemma_id = 11582),
stats AS (SELECT
sentence_id,
count(DISTINCT token_id) AS c,
count(*) AS c_aligned,
count(DISTINCT wtarget) AS c_target
FROM
token
LEFT JOIN word_align ON wsource = token_id
WHERE
sentence_id IN (
SELECT sentence_id
FROM
list
JOIN token ON token_id IN(t11, t21)
)
GROUP BY sentence_id),
numbered AS (SELECT row_number() OVER () AS i, *
FROM
list),
sentences AS (SELECT *, .2 * (1 / (1 + exp(max(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i) - min(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i)))) +
.8 * (1 / log(avg(c) OVER (PARTITION BY i))) AS w
FROM
(
SELECT i, 1 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t11,t12] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t11
UNION SELECT i, 2 AS n, sentence_id, ARRAY[t21,t22] AS tokens
FROM
numbered
JOIN token ON token_id = t21
) x
JOIN stats USING (sentence_id)
ORDER BY i, n)
SELECT
i,
n,
w,
c,
c_aligned,
c_target,
sentence_id,
string_agg(CASE WHEN lpad THEN ' ' ELSE '' END || '<span class="token' ||
CASE WHEN ARRAY[token_id] <@ tokens THEN ' hl' ELSE '' END || '">' || val || '</span>',
'' ORDER BY token_id ASC) AS s
FROM
sentences
JOIN token USING (sentence_id)
JOIN typestr USING (type_id)
GROUP BY i, n, w, c, c_aligned, c_target, sentence_id
ORDER BY w DESC, i, n;
;